Skip to content
DeeptechNavigator

Patent intelligence · Companies

Company patent strength

Non-educational filers ranked by their patent portfolio. Grant rate and lapsed share expose where high filing volume is not matched by granted patents. Domestic filers lead — toggle to foreign applicants to see who is entering the Indian market.

Free to browse the ranking. Sign into open a filer's full profile — inventors, filing trend and quality index. See how we rank.

Why this page exists — and how to read it

Filing volume and IP quality are different things. This leaderboard ranks non-educational filers by portfolio, but the grant-rate and lapsed sorts are where the judgement lives: they separate companies whose filings survive examination from those accumulating paper.

Investors
High grant rate on steady filing usually means a real R&D engine; big volume with a high lapsed share is a red flag worth asking about.
Founders & operators
These are the incumbents and potential acquirers in your space — open a filer to see the walls you'd build against.
Corporate & R&D
Benchmark competitors' portfolios and grant rates; toggle to foreign to watch who is entering the Indian market.

💬 The grant-rate sort applies a 20-filing floor so tiny portfolios can't top the list.

Domestic (India)Foreign applicants
Portfolio sizeGrant rateLapsed

3,207 foreign filers with 5+ patents · page 1

#FilerPatentsGrantedLapsedPendingActive
1QUALCOMM12,1761,33010.9%15210,6942010–2026
2SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS4,72582017.4%293,8762014–2026
3HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES2,8291,03936.7%1011,6892018–2026
4NOKIA TECHNOLOGIES2,7782649.5%182,4962017–2026
5LG ENERGY SOLUTION2,3331114.8%12,2212011–2026
6GOOGLE2,06449624%531,5152018–2026
7BEIJING XIAOMI MOBILE SOFTWARE2,00837418.6%151,6192019–2026
8APPLE1,87930716.3%231,5492018–2026
9TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON PUBL1,37030722.4%1109532019–2026
10MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING1,30534026.1%818842017–2026
11JFE STEEL1,29420215.6%51,0872016–2026
12LG ELECTRONICS1,07417015.8%208842019–2026
13ROBERT BOSCH1,061312.9%669642019–2026
14INTERDIGITAL PATENT HOLDINGS1,013444.3%09692019–2026
15BASF SE1,008535.3%1528032020–2026
16HONDA MOTOR96521422.2%137382019–2026
17NIPPON STEEL95314114.8%68062014–2026
18KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS93324225.9%1055862017–2026
19SUZUKI MOTOR8939310.4%27982011–2025
20ZTE88925428.6%186172019–2026
21MERCEDES BENZ GROUP82910.1%278012022–2024
22VIVO MOBILE COMMUNICATION79446458.4%43262020–2026
23GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS67714421.3%404932019–2026
24MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC65223936.7%753382021–2026
25DAIKIN INDUSTRIES59418931.8%123932020–2026
26CANON56611019.4%104462014–2026
27DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES559539.5%204862021–2026
28ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES5398616%174362018–2026
29UNILEVER GLOBAL IP537458.4%484442021–2026
30INTERDIGITAL CE PATENT HOLDINGS513254.9%14872021–2026
31PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF AMERICA4819820.4%93742020–2026
32ORACLE INTERNATIONAL4098420.5%13242014–2026
33SIGNIFY HOLDING39116241.4%541752019–2026
34MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA3813810%53382021–2024
35BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP37910628%32702019–2026
36CILAG INTERNATIONAL378379.8%1781632021–2026
37OLA ELECTRIC MOBILITY3779324.7%232612019–2026
38LENOVO BEIJING37682.1%13672020–2026
39INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES37015842.7%32092012–2026
40SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION366154.1%373142019–2026
41NINGDE AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY3585916.5%02992021–2026
42TOYOTA JIDOSHA352359.9%53122021–2026
43CISCO TECHNOLOGY3445516%02892019–2026
44EVONIK OPERATIONS3445215.1%282642019–2026
45LG DISPLAY340298.5%03112019–2025
46SAMSUNG DISPLAY321226.9%02992019–2026
47LENOVO SINGAPORE320206.3%03002020–2026
48XIAMEN HITHIUM ENERGY STORAGE TECHNOLOGY31900%03192023–2026
49NEC3106420.6%561902020–2026
50BOREALIS3066621.6%132272017–2026
Next →

Educational institutes are excluded — see the institute leaderboard. Attribution is by patent assignee record; a jointly-owned patent is credited to each co-owner, so a co-filed patent counts for every company on it. "Lapsed" = abandoned, withdrawn, deemed-withdrawn or refused; "Pending" = awaiting examination or in prosecution. Want to filter by technology or value category? Browse the filer explorer →

Rankings use patent-registry status (grant rate, examination, claim depth) as a quality proxy — directional, not advice; see methodology. Read the ranking methodology →